On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:42:46 +0200, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The updated copyright note Looks OK to me ... (Though it seems wrong to reference so many folk yet omit the original author (me)
Uh... I basically took what Xiaofan provided and changed IDs and that's why. But true enough, as I think about it now, I took some parts from the original linux.inf file so there's probably *at* *least* as much your work as mine in there. I'll add you in the next version. Or should I remove the notices all together? Personally I feel they serve two purposes: give credit and let others know who might be a good person to ask question. I'm fine either way...
However, I don't see a version of the patch with the cleaner copyright notice. Also, please don't rename the file without updating all the references to the original name. Since thoses refs are in docs all over the web ... I think it's best to just not rename it.
Ah, haven't thought about that. I grepped Documentation/ but forgot about grepping my personal copy of the Internet I keep in my basement. ;) I intended a consistent naming and that's why the rename. In any way, I'll get the old name in the next version of the patch. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
