--- On Sat, 6/12/10, Maulik Mankad <mankad.maulik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please see the thread at [1]. > [1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-usb/2010/4/6/6259986 > > There were two approches discussed. > (1) Setting tty->low_latency = 0 in u_serial.c > (2) Using the patch at [2] which uses a workqueue > on this Instead of letting the TTY layer schedule it... > would > like your opinion on which one is better. I think just not setting low_latency to 1 would suffice ... simpler all around. If someone were to send a ptested atch with just that change (which also means updating the two comments referring to that flag), I'll try to send an ack quickly, so this gets resolved at last. (I'd send such a trivial patch myself if my temporary mail setup were more normal... and I had hardware handy to test it.) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
