> > Yeah, the rules for use of that > flag "evolved", > > but nobody patched that driver. > > The rule never changed, the bug trapping got better. So At least, the de-facto rule changed. Such changes can be argued as bug fixes (and most developers have been in that situation), but in any case they remain changes. :) Then for some reason > the patches keeps getting ignored I don't recall seeing a patch submitted which updates that driver to stop using the low_latency flag. In fact, the thread Jon referenced included a request from me to submit such a patch for that driver ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
