Re: Imaginative mis-use of a hub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Florian Echtler wrote:

> Correct, but unfortunately, the parallel port is a dying species. Just
> out of curiosity: would such semi-accurate timing be at all possible
> with USB, or is that already excluded by the spec itself?

How accurate do you mean?  It depends on what signals you want to 
regulate.

> (Quick summary: the question is whether it would be possible to time the
> reset pulses on two hub ports so they occur with reliable and
> significant overlap).

It is not safe to reset multiple devices on the same bus at the same
time.  The Linux hub driver won't allow you to reset multiple devices
at the same time even if they aren't on the same bus, although that
could be changed.

Therefore to do this at all, you would have to unbind your hub(s) from 
the hub driver and send commands to them via usbfs or libusb.  The 
timing could be regulated to a precision of about a millisecond.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux