2010/4/19 Michał Nazarewicz:
Yes, I agree. That's why in the first version I proposed the
__usb_init, __usb_exit, etc. tags which could be customized
prior to including composite related files.
Mike Frysinger:
seems like __usbgadget_xxx would be better naming, but i'm not
interested in fighting to get the idea in general accepted
Bit long though, but yes makes more sense.
What's more, I don't see any other (that is cleaner) solution which
would allow flexibility so it seems what we can either choose
a non-flexible solution proposed by this patch or an ugly solution
proposed by my previous patch.
i dont have a problem with your current patch (since there are still
seciton mismatch warnings floating about that i imagine this is going
to fix), just with the general situation
Yes, I understand that. I'm just clarifying the situation we are in
so maybe someone will came up with some better solution then the ones
already proposed.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +---[mina86@xxxxxxxxxx]---[mina86@jabber.org]---ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
