On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:18:46AM +0200, ext Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:10:00AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If this is going into kernel then.. > > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:41:34PM +0200, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > + if ((c = open ("/proc/bus/usb/devices", O_RDONLY)) < 0) { > > > + fputs ("usbfs files are missing\n", stderr); > > > + return -1; > > > + } > > > > Is this needed? > > > > > + > > > + /* collect and list the test devices */ > > > + if (ftw ("/proc/bus/usb", find_testdev, 3) != 0) { > > > > How about "/dev/bus/usb" instead? Some distributions do not enable > > sysfs in their default kernels anymore. > > You mean 'usbfs' not 'sysfs', right? Yes, usbfs of cource :) -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html