On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:39:35PM +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > >>The composite framework has been written using __init and __exit tags > >>to mark init and exit functions as such. This works with most of the > >>composite gadgets however some may need to call init/exit functions > >>during normal operations. One example is mass storage gadget which > >>needs to call exit functions. > >> > >>This patch allows gadgets to define USB_NO_INIT_SEGMENT or > >>USB_NO_EXIT_SEGMENT to remove the __init and __exit declarations > >>from composite framework. > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:28:52 +0200, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >How about we just drop the __init and __exit tags completly and then > >we don't have to propagate this mess any further? > > Personally, I don't care, ;) so if you think it's better to drop it all > together I can change it in a future patch. That would be great. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html