g_serial: scheduling while atomic bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I am getting the following dump with g_serial under the following scenario.

Setup: - OMAP4430 board running Linux (latest mainline)

OMAP4 acts as a serial usb gadget and enumeration is done against a Linux PC
Host. 

microcom is run on the OMAP side and minicom on the Host (Linux) PC side. 

I can type in characters from both the sides and this works.

When trying to send large files (400 KB) with minicom from Host PC to OMAP
board, I get the below dump. 

BUG: scheduling while atomic: microcom/597/0x00000104
Modules linked in: g_serial

Pid: 597, comm:             microcom
CPU: 0    Not tainted  (2.6.34-rc3-00243-g7da23b8-dirty #2)
PC is at _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x24/0x50
LR is at gs_unthrottle+0x50/0x54 [g_serial]
pc : [<c0262690>]    lr : [<bf000fdc>]    psr: 60000013
sp : dfc8de48  ip : dfc8de58  fp : dfc8de54
r10: 00000000  r9 : 00000001  r8 : 7fffffff
r7 : dfdf6800  r6 : dfc8dec4  r5 : a0000013  r4 : dfea0a00
r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00000001  r1 : a0000013  r0 : dfea0a00
Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment user
Control: 10c53c7d  Table: 9fe9404a  DAC: 00000015
[<c002b72c>] (show_regs+0x0/0x50) from [<c00475bc>]
(__schedule_bug+0x58/0x70)
 r5:dfdf6830 r4:dfc8de00
[<c0047564>] (__schedule_bug+0x0/0x70) from [<c02601ac>]
(schedule+0x84/0x50c)
 r5:dfdf6830 r4:dfc8c000
[<c0260128>] (schedule+0x0/0x50c) from [<c0260f68>]
(__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x164/0x1e4)
[<c0260e04>] (__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x0/0x1e4) from [<c0261010>]
(mutex_lock+0x28/0x3c)
 r8:dfdf68a4 r7:dfdf6800 r6:20000113 r5:dfdf6830 r4:dfdf6830
[<c0260fe8>] (mutex_lock+0x0/0x3c) from [<c019ee38>]
(tty_throttle+0x1c/0x54)
 r5:dfdf6830 r4:dfdf6800
[<c019ee1c>] (tty_throttle+0x0/0x54) from [<c019dbb0>]
(n_tty_receive_buf+0xdec/0xe44)
 r5:0000002e r4:00000000
[<c019cdc4>] (n_tty_receive_buf+0x0/0xe44) from [<c019ff08>]
(flush_to_ldisc+0xf4/0x170)
[<c019fe14>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x0/0x170) from [<c019ffd0>]
(tty_flip_buffer_push+0x4c/0x5c)
[<c019ff84>] (tty_flip_buffer_push+0x0/0x5c) from [<bf001c54>]
(gs_rx_push+0x130/0x1d8 [g_serial])
 r5:000000b6 r4:dfea0a00
[<bf001b24>] (gs_rx_push+0x0/0x1d8 [g_serial]) from [<c0053098>]
(tasklet_action+0xa0/0x15c)
[<c0052ff8>] (tasklet_action+0x0/0x15c) from [<c005353c>]
(__do_softirq+0x9c/0x12c)
 r7:00000001 r6:00000018 r5:00000103 r4:dfc8c000
[<c00534a0>] (__do_softirq+0x0/0x12c) from [<c005361c>] (irq_exit+0x50/0x70)
[<c00535cc>] (irq_exit+0x0/0x70) from [<c0029090>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x90/0xc8)
[<c0029000>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x0/0xc8) from [<c0029c08>] (__irq_svc+0x48/0xbc)
Exception stack(0xdfc8de00 to 0xdfc8de48)
de00: dfea0a00 a0000013 00000001 00000000 dfea0a00 a0000013 dfc8dec4
dfdf6800
de20: 7fffffff 00000001 00000000 dfc8de54 dfc8de58 dfc8de48 bf000fdc
c0262690
de40: 60000013 ffffffff
 r5:fa240100 r4:ffffffff
[<c026266c>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x0/0x50) from [<bf000fdc>]
(gs_unthrottle+0x50/0x54 [g_serial])
[<bf000f8c>] (gs_unthrottle+0x0/0x54 [g_serial]) from [<c019ee10>]
(tty_unthrottle+0x48/0x54)
 r5:dfdf6830 r4:dfdf6800
[<c019edc8>] (tty_unthrottle+0x0/0x54) from [<c019c680>]
(check_unthrottle+0x1c/0x20)
 r5:dfc8dedc r4:00000000
[<c019c664>] (check_unthrottle+0x0/0x20) from [<c019cbd0>]
(n_tty_read+0x54c/0x638)
[<c019c684>] (n_tty_read+0x0/0x638) from [<c0198424>] (tty_read+0x88/0xd0)
[<c019839c>] (tty_read+0x0/0xd0) from [<c00ac888>] (vfs_read+0xb8/0x164)
[<c00ac7d0>] (vfs_read+0x0/0x164) from [<c00ac9f8>] (sys_read+0x44/0x70)
 r8:000ddb08 r7:00002001 r6:dfc72aa0 r5:00000000 r4:00000000
[<c00ac9b4>] (sys_read+0x0/0x70) from [<c002a100>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30)
 r8:c002a2a8 r7:00000003 r6:00000003 r5:000ddb08 r4:00002001


Looks like the tasklet "gs_rx_push()" calls tty_flip_buffer_push() which
in turn leads to a call to tty_throttle(). This calls mutex_lock() 
which can sleep.

So we have a code that sleeps in a tasklet and hence this bug. Is my
understanding correct? 

What should be the right way to handle this?

Thanks,
Maulik


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux