On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > > The BKL was used into remount_fs pointed function for serialized access to > super_block from the others super_operations functions. > > The function update_sb(), invoked by remount(), seems already well serialized > with &root->d_inode->i_mutex. Moreover don't seems there are others > super_operations functions in USB core for usbfs that should access to > super_block in a way which require BKL. There is a patch from Jan Blunck pending in the bkl-removal tree that pushes down the BKL into usbfs_fill_super. Can you confirm that this BKL usage does not interfere with the one you just removed, and that it can go the same way? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
