RE: DMA versus PIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Gadiyar, Anand wrote:

> > I have been working on map_urb_for_dma() and unmap_urb_for_dma(), and
> > it seems like a good idea to EXPORT the unmap routine so that HCDs
> > could call it when they need to revert to PIO.  And of course, we will
> > also need to add changes for drivers that have to use PIO for control
> > transfers but can use DMA for other transfer types.
> > 
> 
> For this problem, two approaches were suggested:
> 
> Either we need to add fine grained description of the DMA requirements
> or these exceptional drivers need to handle DMA issues on their own.
> 
> We started off with the first approach, and then after the second
> one was suggested, we started looking at that (did not want to
> disturb other hcd drivers just because MUSB has a problem). Not sure
> which approach is better.

A requirement like "This driver can use DMA except for control
transfers" is okay; that can be implemented simply enough in usbcore.  
Anything more complicated probably should be handled directly in the
driver.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux