On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Hans de Goede wrote: > I've thought about this too (while writing the patch) the patch as is > works for the particular device I'm dealing with atm. As you indicate > above neither solution is perfect, so I opted for this variant for now. > > I decided it would be best to cross the what if the interfaces are > listed in such an order that the "hidden" interfaces are not last bridge, > if and when we encounter a quirky device which actually has that problem. > > Don't get me wrong, I'm fine with making the quirk code handle all > possible variants of this quirk while at it, but as you indicate > yourself, there is no 100% solution. Okay... Well, you should at least print a warning message in the system log when you decide to ignore an interface. If there are any problems as a result of this change, we need to be able to track them down. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
