On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:30:44PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Greg KH wrote: > >> > >> > Hm, so it's back to the original idea of just doing a kzalloc of the > >> > initial buffer, that should solve the problem that Marcus found. > >> > > >> > I'll go dig that back up and if you could test it, that would be most > >> > appreciated. > >> > >> Here's a better solution. ?In theory we could copy just the individual > >> packets from within the transfer buffer, but that would probably take > >> longer than simply copying the whole buffer. > >> > >> (This was a little hasty; I haven't even compile-tested the patch. > >> Some small fixes may be needed.) > > > > Markus, did you test this patch out? > > > > works properly with ISO, (bulk is not tested from my side). please > merge asap this also affects scanners (SANE). Great, Alan, care to resend this to me with a signed-off-by line so I can get it queued up properly? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
