> I like that you broke the patchset up into functional changes, but can > you think about how you would reorder them such that if someone picked > a > random patch to compile and run on (say #2) that they would only be > allowed to enqueue an isochronous URB if all the xHCI functionality is > there? This is for the people that have to run git-bisect. I think > if > you move the modification of xhci_urb_enqueue() to accept isoc URB > into > a separate patch at the end, that will be enough. > OK, we will move the modification of xhci_urb_enqueue() at the end and reorder the patchset. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
