On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:01:30AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:57:12PM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > we should be doing the firmware loading via libusb in userspace and not > > attach qcserial to it at all. the qcserial driver should only claim > > interface which expose AT command interface. > > The difference is basically uninteresting. The Windows implementation > presents as a serial device and loads firmware that way - beyond that, > why do we care? Changing anything at this point will break > existing userspace. > > qcserial should also claim the debug and NMEA interfaces, but the real > thing that would help would be for qualcomm to actually document the > native device interface so we can stop messing around with PPP. Based on other modems, I really doubt we can drop ppp, it seems to be the way that data is sent through this type of device. Unless you have some idea how we could create a "real" network device from this type of hardware? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
