Hi Greg, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:37:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:21:37PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:18:51AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:26:54PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote: > > > > The i.MX95-19x19 EVK board features a USB 2.0 Type-A port, with this > > > > series primarily introducing USB 2.0 support. In the i.MX95 architecture, > > > > the USB wake-up handling mechanism is integrated within the HSIO block > > > > control module, utilizing a dedicated wake-up interrupt. Therefore, we > > > > also implemented corresponding wake-up logic code to properly manage this > > > > functionality. > > > > > > > > For detailed changes can refer to patch commit log. > > > > > > Does not apply to my tree :( > > > > It'd due to below dts patch #2,3 not in usb tree. However, linux-next already > > have them. I see Shawn just send pull request for 6.15. To make it easy, > > let me ping you when usb tree have them, is it ok? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20241204050907.1081781-1-xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx/#t > > That will not be until after 6.15-rc1 is out. In this series, patch #1-4 should go to usb tree and path #5,6 should go to Shawn tree. You can't apply patch #5,6, right? However, you can ignore patch #5,6 and pick up patch #1-4, am my understanding right? Shawn will pick patch #5,6 to his tree. Thanks, Xu Yang
