On 7.03.2025 12:07 PM, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:11:15PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> MSM8916 seems to reuse the same hardware as MSM8974 and friends (for >> whom this binding document was created). Add a new compatible for it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,kpss-acc-v2.yaml | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,kpss-acc-v2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,kpss-acc-v2.yaml >> index 202a5d51ee88c7190805efe8f1bf493bdb69ec45..27dae49163fa0790ceb6fda8a5c674f739d4a41a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,kpss-acc-v2.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,kpss-acc-v2.yaml >> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ description: >> >> properties: >> compatible: >> - const: qcom,kpss-acc-v2 >> + enum: >> + - qcom,msm8916-kpss-acc > > Hm, MSM8916 doesn't have a *K*PSS (Krait Processor SubSystem), it has an > *A*PSS (ARM Cortex – A53 SubSystem, or Application Processor SubSystem). You would think that, but actually it's still called KPSS internally.. > > I think this should be either qcom,msm8916-apss-acc, or you just keep > the qcom,msm8916-acc we already use. I'm guessing ACC stands for > "Application Clock Controller", so it would be unique enough already. > > There is actually a patch from Rayyan already with a R-b from Krzysztof. > Maybe you, or whoever is responsible, can pick it up? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240710155226.130086-1-rayyan.ansari@xxxxxxxxxx/ I'm not opposed to this either Looks like Sebastian Reichel and/or Ulf pick up power dt-bindings patches Konrad
