On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:46:21 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > I think a better solution is to do something as: > > if (!hrtimer_active(&rq->napi_timer)) > hrtimer_start(&rq->napi_timer, us_to_ktime(5), HRTIMER_MODE_REL); sounds good
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:46:21 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > I think a better solution is to do something as: > > if (!hrtimer_active(&rq->napi_timer)) > hrtimer_start(&rq->napi_timer, us_to_ktime(5), HRTIMER_MODE_REL); sounds good
![]() |