On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 17:43:17 schrieb Alan Stern: > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > From 271f10a4643c788be08cc481dc594ee87af25140 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:46:08 +0100 > > > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] usb:Push BKL on open down into the drivers > > > > > > Straightforward push into the drivers to allow > > > auditing individual drivers separately > > > > This is a lot of work. Maybe it should be submitted separately from > > the usbfs changes. > > How would you like it? Submitted to lkml? I hesitate to split it up. > Due to the peculiar semantics of the BKL it could be applied as several > patches and stay bisectable, but I don't think this is a good idea. > Locking changes should be done in one piece. No, I'll take it "as-is", don't worry about it. thanks, greg 'my patch queue sucks' k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
