Hi,
I had a process related question. Once an RFC patchset gets a
Reviewed-by tag, do I need to send a formal [PATCH] or is an RFC patch
sufficient for being accepted?
I tried to look for it in the Kernel documentation but couldn't find.
Please can you help me on the next steps.
Thanks,
Amit
On 9/24/24 8:11 PM, Amit Sunil Dhamne wrote:
USB PD specification defines a bunch of timers that can have a range of
acceptable values instead of specific values. These values have to be
tuned based on the platform. However, TCPM currently sets them to a
default value without providing a mechanism to set platform specific
values.
This patchset adds new DT properties per timer to allow users to define
platform specific values.
Changes compared to v3:
- nit: removed an extra newline that got added in tcpm_register_port()
Changes compared to v2:
- Added min, max & default values to DT property in Documentation.
- Changed return type of tcpm_fw_get_timings to void instead of int.
Changes compared to v1:
- Defined new properties per timer that we are interested in rather
than defining a single pd-timers u32 array property.
- Better description of the timer properties.
- Since subject has changed, adding link for previous patchset for
posterity:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240911000715.554184-1-amitsd@xxxxxxxxxx/
Amit Sunil Dhamne (2):
dt-bindings: connector: Add properties to define time values
usb: typec: tcpm: Add support for parsing time dt properties
.../bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml | 35 ++++++++-
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 73 +++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
base-commit: 68d4209158f43a558c5553ea95ab0c8975eab18c
