On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Sean wrote: > Alan, > This last patch seems to do the job. Thanks so much for your help! Where > do I donate/send beer? Um, when you say it does the job, what do you mean? The job it was _intended_ to do was to prove that your problems are caused by hardware errors rather than software bugs. If the patch causes the problems to stop, without printing any error messages in the log, then it does indeed prove this. After all, the only places the patch changes any persistent values are after it prints an error message. (Admittedly, I didn't expect the problem to stop; I expected to get a bunch of messages from the second ohci_err(). Just out of curiosity, does it make any difference if you remove all those "volatile"s in the declaration line for td1 and td2?) I noticed that your CPU is a Cyrix. Perhaps it is the culprit. Have you tried running the program on a different computer? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
