On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote: > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > index dc1e345ab67e..8f075ab63f65 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_1042A_XHCI 0x1142 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_1142_XHCI 0x1242 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_2142_XHCI 0x2142 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_3042_XHCI 0x3042 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_3242_XHCI 0x3242 > > static const char hcd_name[] = "xhci_hcd"; > @@ -447,6 +448,10 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci) > pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_1042A_XHCI) > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_ASMEDIA_MODIFY_FLOWCONTROL; > > + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA && > + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ASMEDIA_3042_XHCI) > + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME; > + > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI && pdev->device == 0x8241) > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_LIMIT_ENDPOINT_INTERVAL_7; > > -- > 2.42.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
