On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 11:51:48AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 9/13/24 11:43 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > The definitions of vendor IDs are follow the pattern
>
> s/are//?
Yeah, thank you for catching this.
> > PCI_VENDOR_ID_#vendor, while device IDs — PCI_DEVICE_ID_#vendor_#device.
> >
> > Update the ETRON device IDs to follow the above mentioned pattern.
[...]
> > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON &&
> > - pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ168) {
> > + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ETRON_EJ168) {
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
> > }
> > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON &&
> > - pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_EJ188) {
> > + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ETRON_EJ188) {
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME;
> > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
>
> Hm, these 2 *if*s seem mergeable?
It's out of the scope of this mini-series, but seems a good catch!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
