Hi Alan, Sorry to disturb. One question related to it: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:55:00AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > The way I see it, keeping URBs alive while doing a bus suspend just > adds unnecessary complexity without providing any comparable benefit. The actual source clip in function usb_suspend_both show: now first usb_suspend_device do, then usb_hcd_flush_endpoint. Actually these URB are running between them, and indeed if usb_suspend_device return OK, the port is closed, who insure these URB work well? -- Best Regards, - Crane -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
