On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:50:28PM +0800, WangYuli wrote: > The resume operation of Phytium Px210 xHCI host would failed > to restore state. Use the XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME quirk to skip > it and reset the controller after resume. > > Co-developed-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Wang Zhimin <wangzhimin1179@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wang Zhimin <wangzhimin1179@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Chen Zhenhua <chenzhenhua@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhenhua <chenzhenhua@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jiakun Shuai <shuaijiakun1288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > index b5705ed01d83..fabae8420ce9 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_PCH_XHCI 0x51ed > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALDER_LAKE_N_PCH_XHCI 0x54ed > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_PHYTIUM 0x1db7 > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PHYTIUM_XHCI 0xdc27 > + > /* Thunderbolt */ > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MAPLE_RIDGE_XHCI 0x1138 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ALPINE_RIDGE_2C_XHCI 0x15b5 > @@ -407,6 +410,10 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci) > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA) > xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME; > > + if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_PHYTIUM || > + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PHYTIUM_XHCI) > + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME; > + > /* See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79511 */ > if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA && > pdev->device == 0x3432) > -- > 2.43.4 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
