Re: leaving URBs scheduled across system sleep (was:Re: Alan's idea about syspending the whole bus at once)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Sarah Sharp wrote:

> I think you might run into a snag with USB 3.0 hubs.  Here's the quote
> from section 10.8 of the USB 3.0 bus spec:
> 
> "Global suspend/resume refers to the entire bus being suspended or resumed
> without affecting any hubâ??s downstream facing port states; selective
> suspend/resume refers to a downstream facing port of a hub being suspended or
> resumed without affecting the hub state.  SuperSpeed hubs only support
> selective suspend and resume. They do not support global suspend and resume."
> 
> I would have to read the hub portion of the spec closely to figure out
> if what you're proposing is possible, but my initial reaction is that
> the bus spec authors didn't intend for software to globally suspend the
> bus on system sleep.

Indeed, to judge by the text you quoted it would appear that the 
authors did not intend SuperSpeed buses _ever_ to be "globally" 
suspended.  Except perhaps in the trivial case where all the attached 
hubs already are selectively suspended.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux