On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 09:25:29PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2009 02:36:16 schrieben Sie: > > > Nice, but I have to question the approach. What do you do if you > > > want to debug udev malfunctioning and do you want anybody > > > anybody who needs lsusb to also use udev? > > > > Then the option "--usbfs" will use "raw" usbfs messages and go around > > libudev. But that option is still in the planning stages, but the > > infrastructure to read raw USB config structures is in place already> > > That logically leads to the question why you bother with the udev version > at all. It looks like an internal duplication of code. Sure, it might be, let's see how it all works out in the end. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html