On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:11:09AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2009 05:51:55 schrieb Greg KH: >> > On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 07:35:41PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> > > Hello. Will be lsusb(8) rewritten to use new libusb? >> > >> > No, it is being currently rewritten to use libudev instead. Work is >> > going slowly, but it is usable now, it's at: >> > github.com/gregkh/lsusb.git >> > if anyone wants to look at it. >> >> Nice, but I have to question the approach. What do you do if you >> want to debug udev malfunctioning and do you want anybody >> anybody who needs lsusb to also use udev? > > Then the option "--usbfs" will use "raw" usbfs messages and go around > libudev. But that option is still in the planning stages, but the > infrastructure to read raw USB config structures is in place already> > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > What's the benefit of not using libusb (newbie question)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
