On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:36:16AM +0100, André Draszik wrote: > There is no need for using the ternary if/else here, simply mask > TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF as necessary, which arguably makes the code > easier to read. > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c > index ad9bb61fd9e0..5b5441db7047 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c > @@ -193,9 +193,8 @@ static void process_rx(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, u16 status) > * Read complete, clear RX status alert bit. > * Clear overflow as well if set. > */ > - ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT, status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF ? > - TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF : > - TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS); > + ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT, > + TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF)); > if (ret < 0) > return; > > @@ -297,9 +296,8 @@ static irqreturn_t _max_tcpci_irq(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, u16 status) > * be cleared until we have successfully retrieved message. > */ > if (status & ~TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS) { > - mask = status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF ? > - status & ~(TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF) : > - status & ~TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS; > + mask = status & ~(TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS > + | (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF)); > ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT, mask); > if (ret < 0) { > dev_err(chip->dev, "ALERT clear failed\n"); > > -- > 2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog -- heikki