On 29/07/2024 03:03, Peng Fan wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: mxs-usb-phy: add nxp,sim >> property >> >> i.MX7ULP need properly set System Integration Module(SIM) module >> to make usb wakeup work well. This will add a "nxp,sim" property. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - add else branch suggested by Rob >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,mxs-usbphy.yaml | 17 >> +++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,mxs- >> usbphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,mxs- >> usbphy.yaml >> index f4b1ca2fb562..ce665a2779b7 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,mxs-usbphy.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,mxs-usbphy.yaml >> @@ -87,6 +87,12 @@ properties: >> maximum: 119 >> default: 100 >> >> + nxp,sim: > > "nxp,imx7ulp-sim" should be better. SIM is specific to i.MX7ULP as of now. Can you guarantee that? IOW, if you ever, ever come with another "sim" property for another SoC NXP agrees that it will be rejected? Properties should be defined once and naming such per-soc kind of contradicts it. Best regards, Krzysztof
