>>>>> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host >>>>> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array. >>>> >>>> Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description? >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94 >>> >>> Markus, please stop reviewing USB patches. This is not helpful at all, >>> and causes new developers extra work for no reason at all. >> >> How does this feedback fit to the linked information source? > > That is not what I wrote. You indicated concerns according to patch review processes, didn't you? See also: * Patch submission notes https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#L100 * Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n3 > I wrote, "Please stop reviewing USB patches." > > Please stop now. I might be going to influence evolution of this software area in other ways under other circumstances. Regards, Markus
