On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > 2) All this patch does is cover up a pretty serious bug, without completely > > covering it up. The end-user still winds up with an unreliable storage > > device. With your patch, it may simply be a little less unreliable. > > It may be possible to do this with an RT thread. Maybe something like > this untested version? If you want to make the usb-storage thread RT, why not do so from the beginning? However it's far from clear that this would be a good thing to do. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
