On 05/06/2024 03:50, Jung Daehwan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:20:44AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 03/06/2024 10:51, Jung Daehwan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> + if (device_property_read_bool(tmpdev, "write-64-hi-lo-quirk")) >>>>>>> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO; >>>>>> >>>>>> Where is any user of this property (DTS)? Just to clarify: your >>>>>> downstream does not matter really. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is set by dwc3 parent node by software node. >>>>> >>>>> [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add 'snps,xhci-write-64-hi-lo-quirk' quirk >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/1717135657-120818-2-git-send-email-dh10.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >>>> >>>> This is not a patch to DTS. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> This is set by software node from dwc3. That's why I think this patch doesn't >>> need DTS patch. I would add DTS patch in dwc3 not xhci if it's needed. >>> >> >> What? >> >> I asked you question which upstream SoC (link to DTS) uses it, and you >> say that "no need for DTS patch"? That's not an answer. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> > > I'm sorry I didn't get your point. I've been working on Exynos SoC. > But there's no upstream user of this property yet in this patchset. That's the point... it makes quite tricky to evaluate whether the binding is reasonable or not. Upstream your DTS. Otherwise I say this can be deduced from existing compatible and property is not needed. Sorry, that's a no. Best regards, Krzysztof
