On 15/04/2024 10:54, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:05:38PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Merging >> ======= >> All further patches depend on the first patch. >> >> Description >> =========== >> This is going to be a bit of a patch-bomb, but with trivial patches, so >> I think it is still acceptable. If it is too much, apologies and I will >> solve it. > > No, sending 51 trivial one-line cleanup patches like this is not > acceptable. > > This is just one logical change so squash them all into one patch for > the entire subsystem (i.e. this series should contain two patches). > Sure. This is not exactly one logical change, but two, because the first patch might fix some drivers which forgot to set the owner (even if I did not identify them). Best regards, Krzysztof
