Hi, On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:00:24PM -0700, Abhishek Pandit-Subedi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:06 PM Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 04:48, Jameson Thies <jthies@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > ucsi_register_altmode checks IS_ERR on returned pointer and treats > > > NULL as valid. This results in a null deref when > > > trace_ucsi_register_altmode is called. Return an error from > > > ucsi_register_displayport when it is not supported and register the > > > altmode with typec_port_register_altmode. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in V2: > > > - Checks for error response from ucsi_register_displayport when > > > registering DisplayPort alternate mode. > > > > > > drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 3 +++ > > > drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.h | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > > index cb52e7b0a2c5c..f3b413f94fd28 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > > @@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ static int ucsi_register_altmode(struct ucsi_connector *con, > > > switch (desc->svid) { > > > case USB_TYPEC_DP_SID: > > > alt = ucsi_register_displayport(con, override, i, desc); > > > + if (IS_ERR(alt) && PTR_ERR(alt) == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > > This makes it ignore EOPNOTSUPP if it is returned by the non-stub > > implementation. I think the current state is actually better than the > > implementation found in this patch. I'd suggest adding a comment to > > ucsi_register_displayport() stub instead. > > So originally on my system, I didn't have the displayport driver > config enabled. My expectation was that the alt-mode would show up but > would not be controllable (like all other alt-modes without drivers). > What ends up happening is that no alt-mode shows up and trying to > enable the trace crashes. > > When the displayport support isn't there, I think it should just be > enumerated as a normal, unsupported alt-mode. This sounds reasonable. Thus if displayport support is not compiled in ucsi_register_displayport() should just call typec_port_register_altmode(), I guess. Best regards, Christian