On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 07:55 +0000, Yi Yang wrote:
> Replace the direct return statement in ax88772_bind() with goto, to adhere
> to the kernel coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yiyang13@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> index d8f86bafad6a..11417ed86d9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
>
> ret = usbnet_get_endpoints(dev, intf);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto mdio_err;
>
> /* Maybe the boot loader passed the MAC address via device tree */
> if (!eth_platform_get_mac_address(&dev->udev->dev, buf)) {
> @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_dbg(dev->net, "Failed to read MAC address: %d\n",
> ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto mdio_err;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
>
> ret = asix_read_phy_addr(dev, true);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto mdio_err;
>
> priv->phy_addr = ret;
> priv->embd_phy = ((priv->phy_addr & 0x1f) == AX_EMBD_PHY_ADDR);
> @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> &priv->chipcode, 0);
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_dbg(dev->net, "Failed to read STATMNGSTS_REG: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto mdio_err;
> }
>
> priv->chipcode &= AX_CHIPCODE_MASK;
> @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static int ax88772_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
> ret = priv->reset(dev, 0);
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_dbg(dev->net, "Failed to reset AX88772: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto mdio_err;
> }
>
> /* Asix framing packs multiple eth frames into a 2K usb bulk transfer */
As noted by Simon in the previous submission, this kind of change
should target the 'net-next' tree, you can't bundle it in a 'net'
series. You have to submit the 'net' patch, get it merged, wait until
'net' is merged back into 'net-next' and then submit the 'net-next'
follow-up.
Please read Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst for the gory
details.
Additionally, I would also suggest to drop instead the 'mdio_err'
label: there is little/no gain replacing a return statement with jump
to a return statement.
Cheers,
Paolo
