On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:02:21AM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> In its current form, the interrupt service routine of the tps25750
> checks the event flags in the lowest 64 bits of the interrupt event
> register (event[0]), but also in the upper part (event[1]).
>
> Given that all flags are defined as BIT() or BIT_ULL(), they are
> restricted to the first 64 bits of the INT_EVENT1 register. Including
> the upper part of the register can lead to false positives e.g. if the
> event 64 bits above the one being checked is set, but the one being
> checked is not.
>
> Restrict the flag checking to the first 64 bits of the INT_EVENT1
> register.
>
> Fixes: 7e7a3c815d22 ("USB: typec: tps6598x: Add TPS25750 support")
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> index 0717cfcd9f8c..7c2f01344860 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> @@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ static irqreturn_t tps25750_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> if (!tps6598x_read_status(tps, &status))
> goto err_clear_ints;
>
> - if ((event[0] | event[1]) & TPS_REG_INT_POWER_STATUS_UPDATE)
> + if (event[0] & TPS_REG_INT_POWER_STATUS_UPDATE)
> if (!tps6598x_read_power_status(tps))
> goto err_clear_ints;
>
> - if ((event[0] | event[1]) & TPS_REG_INT_DATA_STATUS_UPDATE)
> + if (event[0] & TPS_REG_INT_DATA_STATUS_UPDATE)
> if (!tps6598x_read_data_status(tps))
> goto err_clear_ints;
>
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tps25750_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> * a plug event. Therefore, we need to check
> * for pr/dr status change to set TypeC dr/pr accordingly.
> */
> - if ((event[0] | event[1]) & TPS_REG_INT_PLUG_EVENT ||
> + if (event[0] & TPS_REG_INT_PLUG_EVENT ||
> tps6598x_has_role_changed(tps, status))
> tps6598x_handle_plug_event(tps, status);
>
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please
follow the documented rules in the
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
