Hi Dave, On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:47:14 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This also means you weren't doing allmodconfig builds on your USB tree > this entire time, because if you had you would have realized that this > fix belonged there not in net-2.6 :-) And if the USB bits were > going in via -next I'm really surprised Stephen Rothwell wasn't > complaining about this too :) I did - a posting on Dec 9 with subject "linux-next: staging tree build failure" (which should have been "usb tree" - and I corrected that). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpOjXU56mOyP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
