On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 8:42 PM Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8.2.2024 12.32, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 2:23 PM Mathias Nyman > > <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> My guess is that CPU0 spends more time with interrupts disabled than other CPUs. > >> Either because it's handling interrupts from some other hardware, or running > >> code that disables interrupts (for example kernel code inside spin_lock_irq), > >> and thus not able to handle network adapter interrupts at the same rate as CPU23 > >> > > > > Can this be fixed? > > Not sure, I'm not that familiar with this area. > Maybe running irqbalance could help? I installed irqbalance daemon and nothing changed. So who is responsible for irq balancing? -- Best Regards, Mike Gavrilov.
<<attachment: measuaments-irqbalance.zip>>