On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 07:44:21PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 18:00:00 schrieb Simon Richter: > > > Does that follow the cdc-acm spec? That's what we need to follow here. > > > > From how I interpret the spec, it does; I was hoping on input from > > someone who was involved in the decision to implement it the current > > way, as they might know better if there are devices we actually want to > > ignore (i.e. from a practical point of view). > > The cdc-acm driver was supposed to support modems, defining modems > as devices that implement the AT command set. > One can argue that a serial interface may or may not be a modem. Exactly. Also, does the windows cdc acm driver accept devices with USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html