Re: New usb_autopm design

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2009 16:45:56 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > I don't like the new requirement that drivers must balance their calls
> > to usb_autopm_get_interface() and usb_autopm_put_interface().  It's
> > awkward; it forces drivers to keep track of the number of unbalanced
> > get's.  Just consider what you would need to change in order to
> > implement it in the serial drivers and you'll see what I mean.
> > 
> > It seems a lot easier to have usbcore keep track for everybody.  Then 
> > the drivers won't need to be updated.
> 
> It would make life easier for drivers. What about the _async() versions?

Not a problem.  They update the usage counter first, synchronously, 
before submitting a request for an async suspend or resume.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux