On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:03:13PM +0900, Ingyu Jang wrote: > usb_generic_driver_probe() only returns 0. > Inside this function, there are only errors that are marked as not fatal. > However, drivers/usb/core/driver.c:269 checks > if usb_generic_driver_probe() returns error. > No need to change usb_generic_driver_probe() to return error, > only remove redundant error check. > > Signed-off-by: Ingyu Jang <ingyujang25@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > index e01b1913d02b..b6274580b7ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > @@ -266,8 +266,6 @@ static int usb_probe_device(struct device *dev) > > if (udriver->generic_subclass) > error = usb_generic_driver_probe(udev); > - if (error) > - return error; > > /* Probe the USB device with the driver in hand, but only > * defer to a generic driver in case the current USB Don't do this unless you add comments both here _and_ in usb_generic_driver_probe() explaining that the routine never returns anything but 0. Otherwise, some day in the future someone will change the probe routine to make it return an error code, and won't realize that code here needs to be changed too. Better yet, don't make this change at all. It's a trivial matter and it's not on a hot path. Alan Stern
