Re: Isochronous error handling bug on VIA VL805

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 2. Are there any errors that may need error_mid_td treatment on NEC?
> 3. Are there any errors that may need "not success" treatment on VIA?

Sorry, I meant to write "any other errors", of course.
For VIA, the likely answer is "all errors" or "almost all".


And I forgot to add that while NEC seems to violate the spec, VIA
follows 4.9.1 exactly and other hosts are likely to do the same.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux