Thank you for the review, Greg! Sent out V2 with the comments addressed. On 1/4/24 06:19, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:44PM -0800, Avichal Rakesh wrote: >> There is a path that may lead to freed memory being referenced, >> and causing kernel panics. >> >> The kernel panic has the following stack trace: >> >> Workqueue: uvcgadget uvcg_video_pump.c51fb85fece46625450f86adbf92c56c.cfi_jt >> pstate: 60c00085 (nZCv daIf +PAN +UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) >> pc : __list_del_entry_valid+0xc0/0xd4 >> lr : __list_del_entry_valid+0xc0/0xd4 >> Call trace: >> __list_del_entry_valid+0xc0/0xd4 >> uvc_video_free_request+0x60/0x98 >> uvcg_video_pump+0x1cc/0x204 >> process_one_work+0x21c/0x4b8 >> worker_thread+0x29c/0x574 >> kthread+0x158/0x1b0 >> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 >> >> The root cause is that uvcg_video_usb_req_queue frees the uvc_request >> if is_enabled is false and returns an error status. video_pump also >> frees the associated request if uvcg_video_usb_req_queue returns an e >> rror status, leading to double free and accessing garbage memory. > > Odd line wrapping :( Sigh! Fixed. Apologies. > >> >> To fix the issue, this patch removes freeing logic from >> uvcg_video_usb_req_queue, and lets the callers to the function handle >> queueing errors as they see fit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Avichal Rakesh <arakesh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c | 12 +++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > What commit id does this fix? The commit that caused the bug is not in linus' branch yet. Added the "Fixes" tag with the commit SHA from usb-next branch. Let me know if I should be using some other SHA. > > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c >> index 98ba524c27f5..e5db1be14ca3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c >> @@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int uvcg_video_usb_req_queue(struct uvc_video *video, >> struct list_head *list = NULL; >> >> if (!video->is_enabled) { >> - uvc_video_free_request(req->context, video->ep); >> - return -ENODEV; >> + return -EINVAL; > > Isn't this a separate change? And does it actually matter? It was meant to differentiate between usb_ep_queue failing and the video stream being disabled, but we don't really care about that. Reverted. Thank you! - Avi.