Re: [RFC] usb: r8152: interface driver before device driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:37:59AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> The r8152 interface driver is preferred over the generic
> class driver because it provides more features. Hence
> we now have a device driver that switches the configuration.
> 
> That device driver is sensible only if an interface driver
> for the selected configuration exists.
> However, the initialization for this module first reisters
> the device driver and after that the interface driver.
> That screws up error handling. Both registrations return
> error codes. That means that the registration of the
> device driver can currently work, but the interface
> driver can fail.
> In that case we switch the devices to a configuration
> we have no driver for. That must not happen. The easiest
> fix is to register the interface driver first and
> bail out if that fails. That way if the device driver
> fails, nothing needs to be undone.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: ec51fbd1b8a2 ("r8152: add USB device driver for config selection")
> ---
>  drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index 9bf2140fd0a1..e856ef83cef0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -10117,10 +10117,13 @@ static int __init rtl8152_driver_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = usb_register_device_driver(&rtl8152_cfgselector_driver, THIS_MODULE);
> +	ret = usb_register(&rtl8152_driver);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -	return usb_register(&rtl8152_driver);
> +
> +	ret = usb_register_device_driver(&rtl8152_cfgselector_driver, THIS_MODULE);
> +	return ret;
> +
>  }
>  
>  static void __exit rtl8152_driver_exit(void)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux