On 06-11-23, 12:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > The recently added Realtek PHY drivers depend on the new port status > > notification mechanism which was built on the deprecated USB PHY > > implementation and devicetree binding. > > > > Specifically, using these PHYs would require describing the very same > > PHY using both the generic "phy" property and the deprecated "usb-phy" > > property which is clearly wrong. > > > > We should not be building new functionality on top of the legacy USB PHY > > implementation even if it is currently stuck in some kind of > > transitional limbo. > > > > Revert the new Realtek PHY drivers for now so that the port status > > notification interface can be reverted and replaced before we dig > > ourselves into an even deeper hole with this PHY mess. > > > > Note that there are no upstream users of these PHYs and the drivers were > > only included in 6.6 so there should still be time to undo this. > > No users of these phy drivers yet? Why were they added? Not sure why, they didnt go thru phy ss! > > > Preferably these should go in through Greg's tree for 6.7-rc1. > > I'll be glad to take this if I can get an ack for it. Pls do drop this: Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> -- ~Vinod
