On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 05:17:49PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > The link between the partner device and its USB Power > > Delivery instance was never removed which prevented the > > device from being released. Removing the link always when > > the partner is unregistered. > > > > Fixes: b04e1747fbcc ("usb: typec: ucsi: Register USB Power Delivery Capabilities") > > Reported-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/ZSUMXdw9nanHtnw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > index f3ba2997004a..c9a032a5dbd0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c > > @@ -787,6 +787,7 @@ static void ucsi_unregister_partner(struct ucsi_connector *con) > > > > typec_set_mode(con->port, TYPEC_STATE_SAFE); > > > > + typec_partner_set_usb_power_delivery(con->partner, NULL); > > ucsi_unregister_partner_pdos(con); > > ucsi_unregister_altmodes(con, UCSI_RECIPIENT_SOP); > > typec_unregister_partner(con->partner); > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > Hi, > > This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him > a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond > to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept > writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was > created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem > in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux > kernel tree. > > You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) > as indicated below: > > - You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an > older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the > signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be > applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please > follow the documented rules in the > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve > this. > > If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about > how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and > Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received > from other developers. Note, I've fixed this up by hand, but in the future, please be aware of it. thanks, greg k-h