Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009 01:38:07 schrieb Greg KH: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:15:04PM +0100, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote: > > Am Montag 23 November 2009 10:20:46 schrieb Oliver Neukum: > > > Am Samstag, 21. November 2009 17:56:30 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > this version should be efficient. > > > Stephan, please test. > > > > I have increased the delay to 1000us, as discussed and added a > > tested-by notice. > > > > Is my back-port of interest to anyone? > > backport to what? An older kernel version? I had this patch backported and tested under 2.6.31.4, as this is the kernel (source) used in the current Ubuntu "Karmic Koala". I sent the patch in an earlier mail, which might need tweaking of the delay to 1000us. I just wondered whether this backported patch could make it into an Ubuntu update, but that is rather a question to the Ubuntu package maintainers, rather than to this list. > Should I take this version instead as the delay is longer? The "tested-by" version is the one that should apply to the current development tree, and has the proper delay set. So yes, this is the version that should be taken upstream. Thanks, Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
