On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 4:35 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 5:13 PM Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Sharp's Spitz board still uses the legacy GPIO interface for configuring > > its two onboard LEDs. > > > > Convert them to use the GPIO descriptor interface. > > ... > > > static void __init spitz_leds_init(void) > > { > > + gpiod_add_lookup_table(&spitz_led_gpio_table); > > platform_device_register(&spitz_led_device); > > + spitz_gpio_leds[0].gpiod = gpiod_get_index(&spitz_led_device.dev, > > + NULL, 0, GPIOD_ASIS); > > + spitz_gpio_leds[1].gpiod = gpiod_get_index(&spitz_led_device.dev, > > + NULL, 1, GPIOD_ASIS); > > } > > What's the point of keeping a lookup table after we got descriptors out of it? > Normally the descriptors would be retrieved in drivers and so lookup tables should stay in memory forever as static resources (just like device-tree). We have recently added some "temporary" lookup tables to address even worse hacks. The tables would be removed immediately after the descriptor is retrieved simply because we used that hack in drivers which may be unbound and re-bound resulting in adding repeating lookup entries. Here we're dealing with a board-file so a more classic approach of having static lookup tables added once and never removed is in order. So I'd leave it like this. Bart