Hi Sergei,
Thank you for the review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:10 AM
> To: Patel, Utkarsh H <utkarsh.h.patel@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx; chrome-
> platform@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Configure Displayport
> Alternate mode 2.1
>
> On 9/20/23 5:32 AM, Utkarsh Patel wrote:
>
> > Mux agent driver can configure cable details such as cable type and
> > cable speed received as a part of displayport configuration to support
> > Displayport Alternate mode 2.1.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Patel <utkarsh.h.patel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - No change.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - No change.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - No change.
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c | 24
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > index 60ed1f809130..233958084b43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> [...]
> > @@ -293,6 +299,24 @@ pmc_usb_mux_dp(struct pmc_usb_port *port,
> struct typec_mux_state *state)
> > req.mode_data |= (state->mode - TYPEC_STATE_MODAL) <<
> > PMC_USB_ALTMODE_DP_MODE_SHIFT;
> >
> > + if (!is_pmc_mux_tbt(port->pmc->iom_adev)) {
> > + u8 cable_speed = (data->conf &
> DP_CONF_SIGNALLING_MASK) >>
> > + DP_CONF_SIGNALLING_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + u8 cable_type = (data->conf & DP_CONF_CABLE_TYPE_MASK)
> >>
> > + DP_CONF_CABLE_TYPE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + req.mode_data |=
> PMC_USB_ALTMODE_CABLE_SPD(cable_speed);
> > +
> > + if (cable_type == DP_CONF_CABLE_TYPE_OPTICAL)
> > + req.mode_data |= PMC_USB_ALTMODE_CABLE_TYPE;
> > + else if (cable_type == DP_CONF_CABLE_TYPE_RE_TIMER)
> > + req.mode_data |=
> PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ACTIVE_CABLE |
> > +
> PMC_USB_ALTMODE_RETIMER_CABLE;
> > + else if (cable_type == DP_CONF_CABLE_TYPE_RE_DRIVER)
> > + req.mode_data |=
> PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ACTIVE_CABLE;
>
> Why not *switch* instead of string of *if*s?
>
Switch can be used here but if there is no added benefit, would stick to if/else.
Sincerely,
Utkarsh Patel.
