Hi Zhu, On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:42:46 +0800 Zhu Wang <wangzhu9@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When platform_get_irq_byname() is called to get a interrupt number, it > may return -EINVAL or -ENXIO when failed, while current code returned > -ENODEV, so we replace it with the return value of > platform_get_irq_byname(). And we found that platform_get_irq_byname() > never returned zero by reading its code. The function involve in the code is not platform_get_irq_byname() but platform_get_irq(). Can you update ? With this updated, Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Hervé > > Commit ce753ad1549c ("platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in > platform_get_irq() and its ilk") makes sure IRQ0 is not returned. > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Wang <wangzhu9@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Changes in v2: > - Update the commit message, present the reason of replacing the return > value of the probe. > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c > index 0c3969301a53..c6dfa7cccc11 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c > @@ -2136,15 +2136,15 @@ static int gr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(regs); > > dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (dev->irq <= 0) > - return -ENODEV; > + if (dev->irq < 0) > + return dev->irq; > > /* Some core configurations has separate irqs for IN and OUT events */ > dev->irqi = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); > if (dev->irqi > 0) { > dev->irqo = platform_get_irq(pdev, 2); > - if (dev->irqo <= 0) > - return -ENODEV; > + if (dev->irqo < 0) > + return dev->irqo; > } else { > dev->irqi = 0; > } -- Hervé Codina, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com